The Five Faces of Power: Unpacking GRIPS in a World of Strategic Competition
Why strength today is systemic—and how each pillar must reinforce the others
In an era of global disruption and intensifying rivalry, strategic advantage doesn’t go to the biggest economy or the largest army. It goes to those who are most aligned across systems—who govern with legitimacy, innovate with intent, adapt under pressure, earn trust abroad, and defend with credibility.
That’s the purpose of the GRIPS framework: to diagnose whether a nation is truly positioned for long-term strength.
Each pillar—Governance, Resilience, Innovation, Perception, Security—is a form of power in its own right. But none stands alone. What matters is how they interact—how gaps are closed, how capabilities reinforce one another, and how strategy becomes greater than the sum of its parts.
Here’s what each pillar demands:
🟦 G – Governing Power
Governance is not just structure—it’s direction. Strategic power comes not just from having institutions, but from how they are used.
Governing vs. Gaming – Do institutions serve the public, or are they manipulated for narrow gain?
Grounded vs. Grandstanding – Are leaders focused on substance or spectacle?
Guiding vs. Grasping – Is leadership animated by shared purpose—or by power retention?
Generative vs. Gridlocked – Can the system evolve, or is it frozen in dysfunction?
Legitimacy is power. Alignment is power. In strategic competition, a nation that governs well moves as one\
🟩 R – Resilience Power
Resilience isn’t just endurance—it’s strategic flexibility under pressure. It enables nations to absorb shocks, sustain focus, and adapt.
Responsive vs. Rigid – Can the system pivot when conditions change?
Strategic vs. Short-termist – Is it investing for tomorrow—or chasing headlines today?
Disciplined vs. Deficit-Driven – Does fiscal capacity support strategy—or constrain it?
Redundant vs. Over-optimized – Are critical systems built with buffers—or brittle in a crisis?
Resilience turns disruption into opportunity. Without it, even the most advanced economies crumble under stress.
🟨 I – Innovation Power
Innovation defines the frontier of strategic advantage—from semiconductors to AI to space. But it doesn’t emerge by accident.
Coordinated vs. Fragmented – Are government, academia, and industry working in sync?
Inclusive vs. Inward-Looking – Is the system open to global talent and ideas—or closed off?
Open vs. Overcontrolled – Are creativity and control in balance?
Sustained vs. Sporadic – Is R&D funded consistently, or at the whim of politics?
Innovation power requires ecosystems that compound—not just invent. It’s not just what you create—it’s what you scale.
🟪 P – Perception Power
Perception is not PR. It is a form of influence—shaping who aligns with you, who resists you, and what role you play in the world.
Protector vs. Predator – Do others see you as defending order or exploiting it?
Partner vs. Profiteer – Are your alliances fair—or extractive?
Pacesetter vs. Pretender – Are you setting standards—or just claiming credit?
Principled vs. Parochial – Are you driven by values—or narrow interest?
Pillar vs. Provocateur – Are you a source of stability—or instability?
Performer vs. Paralytic – Can you deliver on promises—or not?
Persuader vs. Propagandist – Are you shaping truth—or spinning it?
In a networked world, how you are perceived is how you are positioned. Trust multiplies power. Distrust constrains it.
🟥 S – Security Power
Security remains the foundation of sovereignty. But in this century, strength must be credible, agile, and integrated—not just big.
Ready vs. Reactive – Are you prepared before crises—or scrambling after?
Agile vs. Archaic – Are your systems built for speed and complexity?
Integrated vs. Isolated – Do your alliances function as one—or as many?
Credible vs. Hollow – Do others believe in your deterrence—or doubt it?
Security is no longer just about how much you spend. It’s about how well your systems deter, mobilize, and adapt.
Strategic Coherence: The Real Test of Power
Each GRIPS pillar matters. But strategic power emerges not from excelling in one—but from integrating all five.
A country with advanced tech but poor governance will find innovation undercut.
A nation with a strong military but no narrative trust may deter no one.
A government that acts short-term will erode resilience—no matter how wealthy it is.
That’s why GRIPS is not a checklist. It’s a blueprint.
It reveals where a nation is strong, where it’s stretched—and where misalignment may invite strategic failure.
Coming in future Frontiers of Freedom post: A deeper dive into how each GRIPS pillar plays out in specific national contexts—starting with U.S. resilience, European innovation gaps, and China’s perception challenge.
Because in this era, strength alone isn’t enough. Strategic coherence is the new advantage.